I'm definitely on the fence on this, so I haven't voted yet. Just listening to the arguments, and actually surprised and delighted that some of the players, who'd actually lose the most in a pwipe, would give that up willingly for the benefit of a mud.
But I have to say this: The idea of some oldbies being allowed to keep all their stuff and then be locked away in the arena för 6 months is about the dumbest thing I ever heard. How on earth would that solve anything at all? It would just keep the imbalance and inflation, so that new players feel that they can never reach what the oldbies have collected during several years. It would create an aristocrasy and a peasantry - which I suspect is exactly why you want it. And on top of this it would make for an extremely boring 6 months for the oldbies, since you'd even be banned from your beloved Recall. Just imagine the withdrawal symptoms.
And who's to decide which players are 'awesome' enough to be selected for this honour?
Me? No way, I hate the entire idea.
Yourselves? By what method? Majority vote? Highest number of remorts? tokens? houses? Who sits at Recall the most? Who actually still PLAYS the game?
It's a terrible idea, and something that I'd definitely wouldn't support, if a pwipe acually happens.
As for the pwipe itself, I am on the fence, but since I actually started out being instinctively and totally against it, I am beginning to recognise the vast advantages that it could bring.
I can understand how it would be agonising to lose all you'd worked for in one stroke.
On the other hand a full pwipe would mean a unique chance to rejuvenate the mud, to restore some balance to it and stop the stagnation. But only a full wipe would achieve that. Not if we allow some players to keep their stuff and continue squatting at Recall, while all the rest have to work their way up.
So, at least in my opinion, it's either all or nothing.
Keep the discussion up, you might actually convince me one way or another.